<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Frank the Tech Guy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.louisvillemusic.org/techcolumn/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.louisvillemusic.org/techcolumn</link>
	<description>Just another LouisvilleMusicNews Staff Websites site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 10:40:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bias, Part 2 (Fixed and Cathode Bias) by Denny</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillemusic.org/techcolumn/2009/11/21/13/#comment-1587</link>
		<dc:creator>Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 10:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://louisvillemusicnews.net/wpmu/techcolumn/2009/11/21/13/#comment-1587</guid>
		<description>Hello -
I appreciate all the great info you have here, and the time it took to do this...
I have just one question. I am new to electronics, so pardon my ignorance. All the bias info is clear and makes sense to me except for the cathode bias. With a resistor between the cathode and ground, where does the current come from that accounts for the voltage drop? I know the resistor is connected to chassis ground, so what provides the current through the chassis and then through the cathode resistor?
I hope I am asking this in a way that makes sense.
Thank You</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello -<br />
I appreciate all the great info you have here, and the time it took to do this&#8230;<br />
I have just one question. I am new to electronics, so pardon my ignorance. All the bias info is clear and makes sense to me except for the cathode bias. With a resistor between the cathode and ground, where does the current come from that accounts for the voltage drop? I know the resistor is connected to chassis ground, so what provides the current through the chassis and then through the cathode resistor?<br />
I hope I am asking this in a way that makes sense.<br />
Thank You</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your UHF Wireless Microphone&#8217;s Days May Be Numbered &#8230; by Frank the Tech Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillemusic.org/techcolumn/2010/01/20/your-uhf-wireless-microphones-days-may-be-numbered/#comment-1665</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank the Tech Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://louisvillemusicnews.net/wpmu/techcolumn/2010/01/20/your-uhf-wireless-microphones-days-may-be-numbered/#comment-1665</guid>
		<description>It is indeed hard not to feel that the consumer has been trampled on in this process.    The reason that the FCC can do this is because the frequency band was never licensed to the wireless microphone industry.    Wireless microphone manufacturers used the band with impunity, and at no licensing cost to them.   Wireless microphones were &quot;legal&quot; in the sense that they did not exceed a set limit for transmitting power, which means they could operate without a license.   But the lack of a license afforded no protection if the FCC needed the frequency band for other purposes, which is what is happening now.

Had the wireless industry decided to license the bands with the FCC, the cost of the devices would have been much higher.   Licensing and frequency coordination is expensive and difficult.    So, instead of being able to buy a wireless microphone system for as little as $100-$200, the low-end systems would have started at probably $500.    The $400 systems would have been $1000.    The quality would have been the same - the only difference would have been a little better protection against interference, and the FCC wouldn&#039;t have as easily been able to take back the frequency band for other uses.   Either way, it costs the consumer.

The 700MHz band, by the way, is to be used for a nationally-coordinated communications system for first-responders - police, fire, and EMS.    When major disasters strike the US, teams from across the country are dispatched to render aid.   Cases in point would be major hurricanes, major forest or brush fires, earthquakes, and so on.    Unfortunately, all of the communications of these emergency workers are tied to their home base and the particular system installed by their local jurisdiction.   Basically, they are unable to communicate with the other responders.   The new system deployed in the 700MHz band will allow everyone to be on the same page, communications-wise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is indeed hard not to feel that the consumer has been trampled on in this process.    The reason that the FCC can do this is because the frequency band was never licensed to the wireless microphone industry.    Wireless microphone manufacturers used the band with impunity, and at no licensing cost to them.   Wireless microphones were &#8220;legal&#8221; in the sense that they did not exceed a set limit for transmitting power, which means they could operate without a license.   But the lack of a license afforded no protection if the FCC needed the frequency band for other purposes, which is what is happening now.</p>
<p>Had the wireless industry decided to license the bands with the FCC, the cost of the devices would have been much higher.   Licensing and frequency coordination is expensive and difficult.    So, instead of being able to buy a wireless microphone system for as little as $100-$200, the low-end systems would have started at probably $500.    The $400 systems would have been $1000.    The quality would have been the same &#8211; the only difference would have been a little better protection against interference, and the FCC wouldn&#8217;t have as easily been able to take back the frequency band for other uses.   Either way, it costs the consumer.</p>
<p>The 700MHz band, by the way, is to be used for a nationally-coordinated communications system for first-responders &#8211; police, fire, and EMS.    When major disasters strike the US, teams from across the country are dispatched to render aid.   Cases in point would be major hurricanes, major forest or brush fires, earthquakes, and so on.    Unfortunately, all of the communications of these emergency workers are tied to their home base and the particular system installed by their local jurisdiction.   Basically, they are unable to communicate with the other responders.   The new system deployed in the 700MHz band will allow everyone to be on the same page, communications-wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your UHF Wireless Microphone&#8217;s Days May Be Numbered &#8230; by CF Henley</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillemusic.org/techcolumn/2010/01/20/your-uhf-wireless-microphones-days-may-be-numbered/#comment-1664</link>
		<dc:creator>CF Henley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 04:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://louisvillemusicnews.net/wpmu/techcolumn/2010/01/20/your-uhf-wireless-microphones-days-may-be-numbered/#comment-1664</guid>
		<description>&gt; The FCC’s action will allow “for rapid deployment of new wireless technologies while protecting consumers who bought wireless microphones in good faith,” Harold Feld, legal director of coalition member Public Knowledge, said in a statement. “

Excuse me, but how is rendering thousands of dollars of my stage gear worthless &quot;protecting consumers&quot;?  This statement makes absolutely no sense.  I have perfectly good working equipment only a couple years old that rebates will net literally pennies on the dollar.  Mr. Feld, the consumer has been attacked, not protected.

Professor Frank, thank you for the warning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; The FCC’s action will allow “for rapid deployment of new wireless technologies while protecting consumers who bought wireless microphones in good faith,” Harold Feld, legal director of coalition member Public Knowledge, said in a statement. “</p>
<p>Excuse me, but how is rendering thousands of dollars of my stage gear worthless &#8220;protecting consumers&#8221;?  This statement makes absolutely no sense.  I have perfectly good working equipment only a couple years old that rebates will net literally pennies on the dollar.  Mr. Feld, the consumer has been attacked, not protected.</p>
<p>Professor Frank, thank you for the warning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Know Your Cables and Connectors by Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillemusic.org/techcolumn/2009/01/01/know-your-cables-and-connectors/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 04:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://louisvillemusicnews.net/wpmu/techcolumn/2009/01/01/know-your-cables-and-connectors/#comment-839</guid>
		<description>Hey Frank, just wanted to ask a couple more questions in reference to Dennis question about  1/4″ mono and stereo (TSR) cables. I have a cheap Behringer mixer xenyx 802, which i want to use to connect my roland sp 404 which has  RCA outs, my Korg electribe esx (which has one set of 1/4 inch outs) and my zoom sampletrak (which also has a set of of 1/4 inch outs) and a korg microkorg. I would be running my turrtables through the line of my esx into the line of my sp-404 into the stereo channel 3 of my mixer then run my microkorg into the line of my zoom sampletrak into the other stereo channel 5 of my mixer . Lastly my mixers outs would be running into my tascam dp01 8 track recorder to record.

So now you know my setup my questions are

A) is this a harmful signal flow and is this possible on my mixer.

B)what cables would best link all these together to make sure that they are all coming into my mixer in stereo

C) This might be a stupid question, but if you plug mono 1/4 inch into the appopriate left and right out and ins would this achieve stereo, so in other words can you achieve stereo by using to mono 1/4 cords or would i better off using using stereo 1/4 inch into both left and right outputs of my samplers

Thanks for taking the time do answer my questions, this issue is giving me a headache and i want to make sure im using my setup the best way possible, a little hiss isnt too bad for me , since i make mostly lofi tape music any way</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Frank, just wanted to ask a couple more questions in reference to Dennis question about  1/4″ mono and stereo (TSR) cables. I have a cheap Behringer mixer xenyx 802, which i want to use to connect my roland sp 404 which has  RCA outs, my Korg electribe esx (which has one set of 1/4 inch outs) and my zoom sampletrak (which also has a set of of 1/4 inch outs) and a korg microkorg. I would be running my turrtables through the line of my esx into the line of my sp-404 into the stereo channel 3 of my mixer then run my microkorg into the line of my zoom sampletrak into the other stereo channel 5 of my mixer . Lastly my mixers outs would be running into my tascam dp01 8 track recorder to record.</p>
<p>So now you know my setup my questions are</p>
<p>A) is this a harmful signal flow and is this possible on my mixer.</p>
<p>B)what cables would best link all these together to make sure that they are all coming into my mixer in stereo</p>
<p>C) This might be a stupid question, but if you plug mono 1/4 inch into the appopriate left and right out and ins would this achieve stereo, so in other words can you achieve stereo by using to mono 1/4 cords or would i better off using using stereo 1/4 inch into both left and right outputs of my samplers</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time do answer my questions, this issue is giving me a headache and i want to make sure im using my setup the best way possible, a little hiss isnt too bad for me , since i make mostly lofi tape music any way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bad Speaker? by Capncruncky</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillemusic.org/techcolumn/2008/12/03/bad-speaker/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Capncruncky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://louisvillemusicnews.net/wpmu/techcolumn/2008/12/03/bad-speaker/#comment-543</guid>
		<description>Your diagram was invaluable! Thank you so much for the simple, yet excellent explanation of the speaker.

P.S. - I&#039;m a musician who walked into a nice set of speakers that need repaired. Its my first time....and is rather exciting...so far.

Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your diagram was invaluable! Thank you so much for the simple, yet excellent explanation of the speaker.</p>
<p>P.S. &#8211; I&#8217;m a musician who walked into a nice set of speakers that need repaired. Its my first time&#8230;.and is rather exciting&#8230;so far.</p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Know Your Cables and Connectors by Mark Schu</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillemusic.org/techcolumn/2009/01/01/know-your-cables-and-connectors/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Schu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://louisvillemusicnews.net/wpmu/techcolumn/2009/01/01/know-your-cables-and-connectors/#comment-829</guid>
		<description>Hey Frank,

Finally have an Alesis RA-100 power amp for my passive Celestion 5 monitors. Right now, they are just connected with bare wire and that is working fine, however, I would like to have use permanent connectors. The RA-100 also has 1/4&quot; OUT and the Celestions use binding posts with round, removable heads spaced too far apart for dual banana jacks. I would like to use the 1/4&quot; OUTS if possible, since the others ones I&#039;m using on the RA-100 are wire push tabs. Any ideas? Thanks, Frank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Frank,</p>
<p>Finally have an Alesis RA-100 power amp for my passive Celestion 5 monitors. Right now, they are just connected with bare wire and that is working fine, however, I would like to have use permanent connectors. The RA-100 also has 1/4&#8243; OUT and the Celestions use binding posts with round, removable heads spaced too far apart for dual banana jacks. I would like to use the 1/4&#8243; OUTS if possible, since the others ones I&#8217;m using on the RA-100 are wire push tabs. Any ideas? Thanks, Frank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Know Your Cables and Connectors by Frank Fendley</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillemusic.org/techcolumn/2009/01/01/know-your-cables-and-connectors/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Fendley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://louisvillemusicnews.net/wpmu/techcolumn/2009/01/01/know-your-cables-and-connectors/#comment-827</guid>
		<description>Abner,

That&#039;s a common problem when a cable develops a fault in the cable itself.
There&#039;s no simple way to determine where the fault lies (unless you can go
through the cable flexing and bending it and discovering that you can clear
the fault temporarily by flexing the cable at a certain point).

Otherwise, you&#039;ll need to cut the cable at the halfway point, and test each
half.   Assuming that there is only one fault, you&#039;ll wind up with one good
cable and one bad cable, each half the length of the old one.    Once you
determine the bad piece of cable, you could go ahead and cut it in half
again and check both of those pieces.    Theoretically, you could wind up
with 2 good pieces of cable, one half the length of the original, and
another one that is one-quarter the length of the original.   Hopefully you
can use some shorter patch cables.

Frank the Tech Guy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abner,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a common problem when a cable develops a fault in the cable itself.<br />
There&#8217;s no simple way to determine where the fault lies (unless you can go<br />
through the cable flexing and bending it and discovering that you can clear<br />
the fault temporarily by flexing the cable at a certain point).</p>
<p>Otherwise, you&#8217;ll need to cut the cable at the halfway point, and test each<br />
half.   Assuming that there is only one fault, you&#8217;ll wind up with one good<br />
cable and one bad cable, each half the length of the old one.    Once you<br />
determine the bad piece of cable, you could go ahead and cut it in half<br />
again and check both of those pieces.    Theoretically, you could wind up<br />
with 2 good pieces of cable, one half the length of the original, and<br />
another one that is one-quarter the length of the original.   Hopefully you<br />
can use some shorter patch cables.</p>
<p>Frank the Tech Guy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Know Your Cables and Connectors by Abner</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillemusic.org/techcolumn/2009/01/01/know-your-cables-and-connectors/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Abner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://louisvillemusicnews.net/wpmu/techcolumn/2009/01/01/know-your-cables-and-connectors/#comment-826</guid>
		<description>Hey Frank,

I always make my own instrument cables from Canare GS-6 and Neutrik connectors. I already made few cable sets, and I got a bad one. This one is dull, the high frequency is just lost. I redo the solder and cut the lenght by 5-7cm, but it&#039;s still not working. Is there anyway to know where exactly the bad spot from the cable ? So I can cut it, and use the remaining length.

Thx
Abner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Frank,</p>
<p>I always make my own instrument cables from Canare GS-6 and Neutrik connectors. I already made few cable sets, and I got a bad one. This one is dull, the high frequency is just lost. I redo the solder and cut the lenght by 5-7cm, but it&#8217;s still not working. Is there anyway to know where exactly the bad spot from the cable ? So I can cut it, and use the remaining length.</p>
<p>Thx<br />
Abner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Know Your Cables and Connectors by Frank Fendley</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillemusic.org/techcolumn/2009/01/01/know-your-cables-and-connectors/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Fendley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://louisvillemusicnews.net/wpmu/techcolumn/2009/01/01/know-your-cables-and-connectors/#comment-825</guid>
		<description>Dennis,

The 1/4&quot; jack on all mixers is a mono connection.   Now, some mixers do have a T/R/S jack, but that&#039;s not for a stereo connection - that&#039;s for a balanced mono connection (where the signal appears between the tip and the ring terminals on the jack, and the sleeve is just used for shielding only).   But don&#039;t let that confuse the issue - if you just a Tip/Sleeve plug into that jack, you ground the ring conductor, and your signal is between tip and sleeve - once again, just a mono connection.

To use the output from a sound card on a PC, which as you indicated is a T/R/S stereo connection, you have two choices.   You can get a 1/8&quot; plug to dual RCA plugs (the Y-cable) and then use two single RCA jack to 1/4&quot; plugs and run each 1/4&quot; plug into a separate channel of the mixer (let&#039;s say channel 1 and channel 2).    If you have a stereo mixer (with L &amp; R separate outputs), you can then pan channel one all the way to the left, and pan channel 2 all the way to the right, adjust the levels of those two channels appropriately, and then you will have the true stereo mix from the PC.

Or, as you say, you can get an adapter that combines the two RCA plugs into one mono 1/4&quot; plug, and just use one channel.    Of course, you have combined the two stereo channels into one channel, and your mixed signal is now just mono.   If it&#039;s a mono mixer, this would be all that would be needed, as you can&#039;t get a stereo mix out of the mixer anyway.

The aux send from a mixer is indeed mono.   To get a stereo signal to go back to your PC for recording, the best way would be to pan various channels mostly left, mostly right, or dead center for mono, and then go from the left and right main outputs through a stereo Y to 1/8&quot; plug to the input jack of the PC.     By controlling how you set the pan on each channel, you control the stereo mix.    It&#039;s best not to pan all the way left or right, or that particular instrument or vocal will only appear exclusively on the one side of your stereo mix.   They made recording that way back in the 1960&#039;s when stereo was in its infancy (some Beatles songs were recorded that way), so that if you listen to the left channel you have acapella singing, and the right channel is strictly instrumental (a la Karaoke).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,</p>
<p>The 1/4&#8243; jack on all mixers is a mono connection.   Now, some mixers do have a T/R/S jack, but that&#8217;s not for a stereo connection &#8211; that&#8217;s for a balanced mono connection (where the signal appears between the tip and the ring terminals on the jack, and the sleeve is just used for shielding only).   But don&#8217;t let that confuse the issue &#8211; if you just a Tip/Sleeve plug into that jack, you ground the ring conductor, and your signal is between tip and sleeve &#8211; once again, just a mono connection.</p>
<p>To use the output from a sound card on a PC, which as you indicated is a T/R/S stereo connection, you have two choices.   You can get a 1/8&#8243; plug to dual RCA plugs (the Y-cable) and then use two single RCA jack to 1/4&#8243; plugs and run each 1/4&#8243; plug into a separate channel of the mixer (let&#8217;s say channel 1 and channel 2).    If you have a stereo mixer (with L &amp; R separate outputs), you can then pan channel one all the way to the left, and pan channel 2 all the way to the right, adjust the levels of those two channels appropriately, and then you will have the true stereo mix from the PC.</p>
<p>Or, as you say, you can get an adapter that combines the two RCA plugs into one mono 1/4&#8243; plug, and just use one channel.    Of course, you have combined the two stereo channels into one channel, and your mixed signal is now just mono.   If it&#8217;s a mono mixer, this would be all that would be needed, as you can&#8217;t get a stereo mix out of the mixer anyway.</p>
<p>The aux send from a mixer is indeed mono.   To get a stereo signal to go back to your PC for recording, the best way would be to pan various channels mostly left, mostly right, or dead center for mono, and then go from the left and right main outputs through a stereo Y to 1/8&#8243; plug to the input jack of the PC.     By controlling how you set the pan on each channel, you control the stereo mix.    It&#8217;s best not to pan all the way left or right, or that particular instrument or vocal will only appear exclusively on the one side of your stereo mix.   They made recording that way back in the 1960&#8242;s when stereo was in its infancy (some Beatles songs were recorded that way), so that if you listen to the left channel you have acapella singing, and the right channel is strictly instrumental (a la Karaoke).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Know Your Cables and Connectors by Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.louisvillemusic.org/techcolumn/2009/01/01/know-your-cables-and-connectors/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://louisvillemusicnews.net/wpmu/techcolumn/2009/01/01/know-your-cables-and-connectors/#comment-824</guid>
		<description>Hi Frank, had a question regarding 1/4&quot; mono and stereo (TSR) cables.

1) Are the line-in jacks on mixers for 1/4&quot; mono cables.  I know that instrument 1/4&quot; cables go in fine, but I sometimes use these line-in jacks for music from a laptop.  So from the laptop the connectors is an 1/8&quot; stereo, so does the 1/4&quot; connector need to be mono (with one stripe)?  I&#039;m assuming that it does since I notice when a 1/4&quot; TSR cable (2 stripes) is plugged in, I only get one signal from the stereo signal, usually the music.

2) If this is the case (where the 1/4&quot; cable needs to be mono and the 1/8&quot; cable needs to be stereo), then is the best cable to get (for my purposes) is a 1/8&quot; stereo to an RCA Y-cable and a RCA-cable to 1/4&quot; mono adapter?

3) For recording, does the Aux send from a mixer output mono?  If that&#039;s the case, then am I right in saying that recording with the cable mentioned above is the right cable to use?  Because I&#039;ll be outputting to a 1/4&quot; mono and going into my laptop with my 1/8&quot; stereo connector.  I&#039;m assuming that should be OK, but that&#039;s the assumption that my macbook pro&#039;s recording 1/8&quot; jack is stereo.

Any comment would be greatly appreciated!!!  Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frank, had a question regarding 1/4&#8243; mono and stereo (TSR) cables.</p>
<p>1) Are the line-in jacks on mixers for 1/4&#8243; mono cables.  I know that instrument 1/4&#8243; cables go in fine, but I sometimes use these line-in jacks for music from a laptop.  So from the laptop the connectors is an 1/8&#8243; stereo, so does the 1/4&#8243; connector need to be mono (with one stripe)?  I&#8217;m assuming that it does since I notice when a 1/4&#8243; TSR cable (2 stripes) is plugged in, I only get one signal from the stereo signal, usually the music.</p>
<p>2) If this is the case (where the 1/4&#8243; cable needs to be mono and the 1/8&#8243; cable needs to be stereo), then is the best cable to get (for my purposes) is a 1/8&#8243; stereo to an RCA Y-cable and a RCA-cable to 1/4&#8243; mono adapter?</p>
<p>3) For recording, does the Aux send from a mixer output mono?  If that&#8217;s the case, then am I right in saying that recording with the cable mentioned above is the right cable to use?  Because I&#8217;ll be outputting to a 1/4&#8243; mono and going into my laptop with my 1/8&#8243; stereo connector.  I&#8217;m assuming that should be OK, but that&#8217;s the assumption that my macbook pro&#8217;s recording 1/8&#8243; jack is stereo.</p>
<p>Any comment would be greatly appreciated!!!  Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

