Wireless Microphone
If you own a UHF wireless microphone in the 700MHz band, you may have only a few months remaining where you can still use it, both from a legal standpoint and from an interference perspective. In other words, it may eventually not be usable due to interference. And if you continue to use one of these microphones, you may be interfering with the new 4G digital communications platforms that are licensed in that frequency band for public safety and first responders.

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission will prohibit hundreds of existing wireless microphone models from being used in the U.S. by June, 2010 because they operate in the 700MHz spectrum band, which was auctioned off to mobile voice and broadband carriers in 2008.

The FCC prohibited electronics makers from selling existing devices that operate in the 700MHz spectrum as of Friday January 8, 2010 in an order issued the same day. Any existing devices broadcasting in the 700MHz band will have to stop operating by June 12, the FCC said.

The main products affected by the ban will be wireless microphones, which have operated without FCC licenses in television spectrum for years. While many wireless microphones operate in lower spectrum bands, and will be able to continue there, the FCC has listed more than 300 models of wireless microphone and related components from 12 major manufacturers that will no longer be allowed to operate in the 700MHz band after June 12, 2010

Among manufacturers listed on the FCC site with wireless microphones operating in the 700MHz band are Audio-Technica, Shure, Sennheiser, Sony and Samson Wireless. Representatives of Shure and two microphone groups didn’t immediately respond to a request for comments on the FCC’s order.

Most wireless microphone systems will continue to work because they don’t operate in the 700MHz band, said Matthew Nodine, chief of staff in the FCC’s wireless telecom bureau. Many wireless microphone makers and users have expected the FCC order since the agency auctioned off the 700MHz spectrum for mobile broadband and other uses in early 2008, he said.

The FCC will try to assist wireless microphone customers with any questions about making the transition to other microphones, Nodine said. Customers may also want to contact their microphone makers, he added. “We’re going to do everything we can to help out customers,” he said.

The FCC has already begun reaching out to people using wireless microphones, and the FCC will conduct an “aggressive” education campaign to reach out to wireless microphone users, the agency said in a press release.

The 700MHz band was formerly used by U.S. television stations, but the U.S. Congress voted in late 2005 to require stations to move off the spectrum and switch to all-digital broadcasts. U.S. TV stations exited the 700MHz spectrum last June.

The goal of the digital TV transition was to free up spectrum for commercial and public safety uses, but the portion of the spectrum dedicated for police and fire departments failed to sell in an early 2008 auction that raised $19.6 billion for the U.S. treasury. Several lawmakers pushed for the digital TV transition after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the U.S. Many of the rescue agencies that responded to those attacks couldn’t communicate with each other because they were using incompatible communications devices on different areas of the spectrum.

The Public Interest Spectrum Coalition, made up of six consumer and digital rights groups, petitioned the FCC to ban the use of wireless microphones on the 700MHz band.

The FCC’s action will allow “for rapid deployment of new wireless technologies while protecting consumers who bought wireless microphones in good faith,” Harold Feld, legal director of coalition member Public Knowledge, said in a statement. “As a result of this order, more spectrum will be available … in the 700 MHz band for new services.”

The FCC order requires wireless microphone makers to tell customers that the devices operate in television spectrum without FCC approval. These notices will “curtail the previous deceptive advertising practices by wireless microphone manufacturers,” Feld said.

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said the commission’s ban on wireless microphones in the 700MHz spectrum was a “necessary and essential action” to complete the digital TV transition.

“Our decision will accelerate the buildout of 4G wireless networks, and will prevent interference with first responders who rely on the 700 MHz Band for mission-critical communications,” he said in a statement.

Nobody likes to learn that a product that they purchased and is still functioning will soon be illegal to operate. But wireless microphones operated essentially free gratis – that is, without licensing – for many years between TV channels in the UHF band. Now that the transition to digital television is complete, the remainder of the UHF spectrum is empty – the only thing that remains is wireless microphones and wireless intercoms in the 700MHz band. Those must be removed as well, so that the spectrum can be designated for emergency communication systems between first responders. The terrorist attacks of 9/11 demonstrated the weaknesses in our emergency communications systems – different agencies were unable to communicate with each other due to different types of radio systems operating in different frequency bands. The transition of 4G to the 700MHz band will allow all emergency responders to communicate with each other – even if they are from different regions and different agencies.

So, now is the time to shop for replacement wireless microphones. Until next time, I’m Frank the Tech Guy.

Welcome back, seekers of technical knowledge! (Wow, was that lame or what?) Anyway, last time we discussed the aspects of bias, and how a control voltage on the grid of an output tube in your amp controls the amount of current flow in the tube itself. To recap, this bias voltage acts as a control valve, setting the idle current in the tube at just the right value, so that the tube neither burns itself up by carrying too much current, nor sounds brittle and choppy because it has too little current and is in “cut off” mode.

Our discussion last time focused on the majority of larger tube amps which use an adjustable bias voltage to control the behavior of the output tubes. But a good number of amplifiers use either permanent fixed bias or cathode bias designs. Let’s look at those designs.

Permanent fixed bias is pretty simple, really. If you understand the adjustable fixed bias, then you’ll find that permanent fixed bias is a design which uses fixed resistors to set the negative bias voltage on the grid permanently, rather than offering an adjustable resistor (rheostat or potentiometer) to allow the bias to be adjusted. The advantage of this concept has been heralded for many years by Mesa Boogie, who proclaims that their amps have an automatic bias system that requires no adjustment, thereby making it easier and simpler for their customers to change tubes themselves. In itself, that is quite true – no adjustment needed, and anyone can change the tubes. The disadvantage is that it’s always necessary in a fixed bias design to set the bias on the “cold” side, to ensure that regardless of the characteristics of the tubes installed, the current through the tube won’t exceed the maximum limit. In other words, they have to err on the side of caution. This means that the output tubes response is pretty sterile – by setting the bias cold, the output tubes add very little coloration to the sound of the amplifier – no early breakup, no “bluesy” overdrive. But most Mesa Boogies are crunch machines, and blues isn’t their sound. The overdrive in a Mesa is handled completely in the front end of the amp, by stacking extra preamp stages. The bottom line is that permanent fixed bias is a low maintenance design, requiring no action by the owner. But (and this is just my personal opinion) – you almost might as well have a solid state output, because you’re getting very little in tonal enhancement from the output stage.

Cathode bias is a type of “automatic” bias. It not adjustable, but it’s handled differently than what we are calling fixed bias. Generally, cathode bias is deployed in smaller wattage amplifiers. It doesn’t require a negative voltage supply from the power supply. So … if you’re up on the technical aspects of using a negative voltage to repel and “slow down” the quantity electrons leaving the cathode headed for the plate, you might be wondering how this control can be accomplished without having a negative voltage available? Well, in electronics, voltages are relative to each other. If we can raise the cathode voltage to a moderate positive voltage (say perhaps 10 to 50 volts, depending on the tube), and we then keep the grid at or near 0 volts (ground potential), then the grid looks negative with respect to the cathode. The electrons on the cathode are still strongly attracted to the plate, because it is a few hundred volts more positive than the cathode. But the grid is still a partial barrier to the electron flow, because it is more negative than the moderate positive potential of the cathode. So, as far as the electrons are concerned, they can’t tell the difference – they behave the same as they do in a fixed bias or adjustable bias configuration where the cathode is at 0 volts, and the grid is at -10 to -50 volts DC.

So how do we achieve this positive voltage on the cathode? It turns out that it’s pretty simple. Whenever you force current flow through a resistor, a voltage develops across the resistor, and the polarity of the voltage depends on the direction of the current flow. If we put a resistor of typically a few hundred ohms between the cathode and ground, the current flow through the tube automatically “lifts” the cathode voltage above ground. The final voltage of the cathode depends on the value of the resistor, and can be calculated fairly accurately though the use of some formulas. By choosing the correct value of resistor, the cathode is set at a moderate positive voltage, and a sort of “automatic” bias is achieved.

Cathode bias has a couple of advantages over permanent fixed bias. It offers some compression, some even-order harmonics, and earlier break-up. It also is somewhat self-adjusting, depending on the specific characteristics of the tube installed. To a significant degree, it’s responsible for the warm bluesy tone quality of the old Fender Champs, the Vox AC15 and AC30, the old Silvertone amps, and pretty much any amplifier that uses 6V6 or EL84 output tubes.

So, including last month’s blog, that’s pretty much our discussion of bias in tube amplifiers. Yep, it’s pretty technical, but it’s a necessary, integral part of how the amp works, and one of the important reasons that a particular amp sounds the way it does. Meanwhile, keep on rockin’, and I’ll be back next time with more technical goodies. I’m Frank the Tech Guy.

Adjusting Tube Bias
Tube bias refers to a voltage setting on the control grid of the output tubes which controls the amount of idle current of the output tubes (power tubes). Much like the idle in your car’s engine, a tube amplifier needs to have the output tubes biased properly for optimal performance. If the output tubes are under-biased (idle current is too HIGH), the audio signal will tend to distort earlier and the tube life will be shortened. This condition is sometimes referred to as biased “too hot”. If the output tubes are over-biased (idle current is too LOW), the audio signal will deteriorate more quickly and the amp will sound thin, cold and sterile. Therefore, this scenario is sometimes referred to as biased “too cold”. Typically, a hotter bias will give you louder, punchier and fuller sound; a colder bias will give you a cleaner, thinner sound.

What’s the perfect bias?
There is no such thing as the “perfect” bias setting that is acceptable for a particular tube type in a specific amp. There are vast differences in output transformers and tubes, varying quality between tube manufacturers and even significant variation between individual tubes of the same brand and type. Bias ranges are also subject to personal taste.

The (boring) intricate details
For those who love the intricate technical details, this paragraph will describe the physics of vacuum tube operation and how the bias voltage plays an important role. If you’re more content with a broad-brushed version of the bias overview, skip on down to the next paragraph. A vacuum tube amplifies by taking a small voltage on the grid element and delivering a much larger voltage on the plate element. Here’s how it works: A tube has a third element called the cathode which emits electrons when heated. The heat from the tube’s heater warms the cathode, giving these electronics sufficient energy to jump through the vacuum space of the tube and land on the plate. Why do they want to do this? Because electronics have a natural negative charge, and the plate of the tube is connected to a rather high positive voltage (several hundred volts). In the physical laws of electronics, opposites attract and the negative electronics are just dying to get to that positive plate. The grid element of the tube is located between the cathode and the plate, and acts as a control valve for how many electronics can successfully make the trip. The grid has a voltage applied that is somewhat more negative than the cathode (typically by about 40 or 50 volts). This is called the bias voltage. Since the grid is negative and like voltages repel, the grid tries to repel or push away the electron flow coming from the cathode. But you can think of the grid as like a sieve or screen (or a protected border with insufficient guards!) – some electrons do make it through, and they wind up making it to the plate. The more negative we adjust the voltage on the grid, the more the electrons are repelled, and fewer make the journey to the plate. The less negative we set the grid voltage, the larger the number of electrons that make it through. Without the grid, there would be no control on the flow of electrons from cathode to plate, and the tube would soon burn up due the excessive current flow and the resulting heat that would be generated. If we set the bias much too negative, no electrons can flow and the tube is “cut off”. If we set the bias insufficiently negative, the tube is in “runaway” and will soon burn up. Now, in addition to the constant DC bias voltage, the grid voltage is modulated slightly by the input signal applied – that’s the audio signal of your guitar reaching the output tubes. This slight variance in grid voltage causes the current to the plate to change in the exact same manner. The plate voltage is applied to the tube through the windings of the output transformer, and the resulting change in the current through the primary of the transformer creates an identical and rather sizable change in the secondary of the transformer – and that is connected directly to your speaker. Whew!

Why must bias be reset over and over again?
So, once you’ve had the bias set and adjusted on your amplifier and you have the perfect sound that you like, why do you need to ever have it adjusted again? Because, as I mentioned before, tubes will vary greatly in their specific characteristics. First, as you might imagine, it’s tough to build a tube in the first place. Much of the process of assembling the components of a tube is done by hand. The individual plate, grid, cathode and heater components are assembled on a jig using hand tools, and then wired to the pins in the base, before the assembly is enclosed in the glass envelope. Naturally, there are slight variations in spacing, size and positioning between the components from tube to tube – and these variations mean that the electrical characteristics will differ. After they are built, each tube is tested and graded according to its specific characteristics, and then sorted matched up with other tubes of similar performance. You can purchase a pair or quad of matched tubes, but there is no guarantee that this bundle of two tubes or four tubes will be exactly like the previous set that you purchased. So, you must “tweak” the bias in your amplifier to fine tune the bias setting so that the new tubes will again perform properly and sound the way you like.

What about fixed bias?
But, you say – what about a fixed bias amp, such as a Mesa Boogie design? How do they get by without requiring (or allowing) you to change the bias? A very good question, and one we will address in our very next blog article. Stay tuned. I’m Frank the Tech Guy – keep on rockin’.

Recently, two great technical innovators in the world of music passed away, only one day apart. I’d like to spend a little time reflecting on their contributions and innovations.
Les Paul
Les Paul died of pneumonia at the age of 94 on August 13, 2009. His contributions to the music field are legendary, and he is credited with building one of the first solid body electric guitars in the 1940’s. Gibson designed a “Les Paul” guitar incorporating his suggestions in the early 1950’s, and the Les Paul guitar is still one of Gibson’s most popular models today, after more than fifty years.

Les Paul is also credited with development of the multitracking recording technique. His first record using the multitracking technique was “Lover (When You’re Near Me)” released by Columbia Records in 1948 and featured Les Paul playing eight different parts on electric guitar. His first overdubbing experiments used acetate discs, but he later switched to using the more accommodating magnetic tape. He later worked with Ampex to design and build the first multitrack tape recording machine, the Model 200. For nearly 40 years, the recording industry used the multitrack tape recording system to record and produce every record since the early 1950’s.

It is incredible enough to have contributed so much to the development of the electric guitar (and certainly not to minimize the contributions of Leo Fender and Adolph Rickenbacker), but to also have developed multitrack recording is phenomenal. Les Paul of course was also a magnificent and innovative guitar player, and had continued to perform at the Iridium Jazz Club in Manhattan until very recently.

Ted Weber died at the age of 58 of complications from pulmonary sarcoidosis the next day after Les Paul, on August 14, 2009.
Ted Weber
Not as well known as Les Paul, but certainly a technical contributor to the music field, Ted had designed and produced a unique type of guitar speaker which was well known for its tone quality. His speakers, individually hand-made in Kokomo, Indiana, were found in the amplifiers of many nationally known musicians, including Kenny Chesney, Brad Paisley, Joe Walsh, Trey Anastasia, Metallica, Derek Trucks, Rascal Flatts, Brooks & Dunn and Taylor Swift. Ted also had a Louisville connection – he studied electronics at the old United Electronics Institute in Shively, and graduated valedictorian of his class in 1971.

Ted’s knowledge and insight into finding the all-elusive perfect tone for guitarists is also legendary. His company also built custom amplifier kits for those who wished to build their own hand-wired boutique guitar amplifiers. Ted was one of a kind – a truly “nice guy” who went out of his way to help his customers. He responded personally to hundreds of emails each day, offering suggestions to guitarists on ways to improve their sound. I have had many conversations with Ted over the years, and purchased many of his company’s fine products. He will be missed. His company will continue under the leadership of his son and partner, T.A. Weber.

Ted’s and his family’s sense of humor and perspective is evident in the following graphic they are now displaying on the www.tedweber.com web site … it’s called a “Tedstone”
Tribute to Ted Weber

Until next time, keep on working on that perfect song with the perfect tone. I’m Frank the Tech Guy.

null

A common question I hear from guitar and bass players is “How do I know when to change output tubes?” A very good question, since output tubes aren’t cheap, and while you don’t want to change them needlessly, you also don’t want to sacrifice tone quality and risk damaging your amp by using tubes that are on their last legs.

So, how do you know when it’s time for new tubes? The short answer is to change them on a schedule, based on how often you play your amp. If you play moderately, about once a year is a good rule of thumb. If you play a heavy schedule (3-4 days per week, 3-4 hours per day or more), about every six months would be better.

Now for the long answer – determining by certain symptoms when your output tubes may be running on empty. These tips are especially useful when you’ve just bought a used amp from a store, an individual or on eBay, and you’re not sure how old the output tubes might be.

Signs that new output tubes might be in order
1. Output is weak, breaking up or distorted.
This one is tricky because it can also be due to the output transformer. But, if only due to complexity, cost, and likelihood of failure, it makes sense to change the tubes first.
2. Tubes show signs of overheating, darkening of the glass, or the plates of the tube glowing cherry red (shut down the amp if you observe this last symptom).
This can also be a sign of output transformer damage or decay or just overbiasing. With any output tube change the bias needs to be checked but with this one it is especially important.
3. Internal arcing
Make sure and check the tube sockets and screen grid resistors if this happens. Usually accompanied by B+ or primary fuse failure.
4. Bad tone
This one is highly subjective and if your output is not less than normal it is likely that your tone issues lie elsewhere – the preamp tubes may be the more likely culprits in this case.
5. Looking for a different sound?
Again, pre-amp tubes are probably a better choice for this but if you have some experience and have heard a lot of tubes, the output section can be a place to tweak your amp. Remember, if you decide to change from 6L6 outputs to EL34 outputs and your amp is not equipped with a bias selector switch on the back, you will need to have the bias circuit modified by a tech.
6. Cracked glass – tube looks “milky” inside.
No choice here. Reach for new tubes. And always change the output tubes as a set – a matched set.

Things that do not directly indicate time for an output tube change
1. Blue light or blue glow in the tubes that pulses with your playing
When tubes are flashed, the residual impurities in the vacuum are more or less removed. The less perfect the vacuum in the tube, the more blue pulsing you will see. By itself this indicates almost nothing. Ignore it.
2. Dirty tubes
Wait until they are cool and clean them with a paper towel sprayed with glass cleaner. Your amp will run cooler and love you for it.
3. Humming, noise, hiss, etc
None of these directly indicate power tube failure. If you don’t know for sure and your tubes are relatively new anyway (say six months of moderate playing or three months of heavy playing) then taking the amp to a tech may be less expensive in the long run. Hum, for instance, could come from out of balance on the output section. But that could be coming from a problem with biasing or the OT or it might have nothing to do with the output section and might be a crossed heater wire in the preamp or an unbalanced hum rejection circuit for the heaters, failing filter caps or any other number of things.

Output tubes are the heart and soul of your amplifier. You change your strings regularly to ensure a good tone – don’t forget to change your output tubes when needed for the same reason.

Until next time, take good care of your amp and it will take care of you. I’m Frank the Tech Guy.

Hi! We’re back. Last time we discussed the level of available service on electronic musical products, focusing particularly on guitar and bass amplifiers. As promised, this time we will talk about pro audio equipment, keyboards, and effects units, and how the availability of repair services varies greatly by brand name.

First, let’s focus on PA equipment for a moment. Since some of the larger amplifier manufacturers also build PA gear, we’ll touch on some names briefly that we discussed last time. Peavey comes to mind first. Peavey offers a wide variety of pro audio equipment and even commercial PA gear for building installations. As I said last time, Peavey has one of the best service departments going today, and service availability shouldn’t be a concern at all when it comes to purchasing Peavey equipment. I’d give Peavey a 5-star rating on support for their products.

We’ll also discuss Behringer, since they are a major player in both the amplifier and the pro audio market. I’ll quote what I said last time, since it is applicable to the Behringer pro audio line: “With Behringer products, all warranty service is in the form of exchange. You take your broken Behringer amp back to the dealer, and they arrange for a replacement unit. On occasion, they may be able to give you a replacement on the spot, if they have sufficient quantity in stock. But that is the exception rather than the rule, and in most cases you’re going to have to wait until they get a replacement from the factory. Most of the time, that’s about 1-2 weeks. Sometimes, however, it can be several weeks, if the warehouse doesn’t have it available. After warranty, service is in the hands of non-warranty service centers, and all of those are stand-alone electronics shops. Behringer has a weird rule about not allowing dealers who sell their products to be a service center for them. So, you may have bought your Behringer from Bill’s Local Music Store, but you’re might to have to take it to Joe’s Electronics for service, even though Bill’s Music has a service center on premise. In Kentucky, there is only one Behringer service center, in Elizabethtown. There are none in Indiana. Servicing Behringer products can be a challenge for non-authorized service centers, due to lack of parts and documentation. Even for the authorized service centers, parts supply can be slow and unpredictable. So, even though Behringer products are actually good buys for the money (some of their products are actually exceptionally good), the adage that ‘you get what you pay for’ still holds true. Service availability may be a bit below your expectations.”

Mackie has also been a major player in PA gear for the past 15 years, but that is changing. Mackie is part of Loud Technologies, and we discussed the abysmal support that they offer for their products earlier when we touched on the Crate and Ampeg lines. Their support, both during and after warranty, is simply horrible. If you have a broken Mackie product that must have a factory part in order to make it function, chances are slim that it will work again. If you value your gear, you won’t make Mackie part of that equation.

On a brighter note would be Yamaha. Much like Peavey, they have a great parts department, offer fine support for their service centers, and really do build some quality products. My only beef with Yamaha PA products is their EMX line of powered mixers. Due to the design of the power supply, they have an unusually high failure rate in my opinion, and they are quite difficult to repair. After warranty, that translates into high repair bills for the EMX product line. If you steer clear of the EMX powered mixer line, Yamaha offers some fine equipment and good support.

A quick rundown on other brands of pro audio equipment: My five-star list would include Peavey and Yamaha, plus Crest, QSC, Allen & Heath, Community Sound, A*R*T, Bag End, and Klark Teknik. My four-star list includes Crown, JBL, Alto, Ashly, Denon, Lexicon and Numark. Three-star would be Phonic. Two-star would include Nady, Galaxy, Rane and Behringer. One-star would include Mackie and EAW (also part of the Loud Technologies family.

Now, a word about keyboards. We’ll touch on what I would call the “big three” – Yamaha, Korg and Roland. Yamaha tops the list in support – see the discussion on their quality of service in the PA section, above. Korg comes next, with a pretty good service center. I rank Roland last, not because they don’t have good support, but because they are very picky about how many service centers they have and their qualifications and requirements for being approved as a service center. You would think that their requirements would be a good thing – and in a way, it is – but they make it so difficult and so costly for the service center to qualify that there are actually very few Roland service centers. That means when it comes time for service, you may not find a Roland service center close to you. And that means more of a hassle for you, compared to the ease of finding service for Yamaha and Korg owners.

Finally, a quick note on effects units. Most floor pedals cost between $100-$200, and in many cases after-warranty service isn’t cost effective. However, I’ll make note of the companies that do a darn good job of supporting their products (and those that don’t). Dunlop is excellent at support, so fear not if you own a Cry-Baby or an MXR pedal. Visual Sound is a small company in Tennessee that makes a few types of quality chorus and delay pedals, and their service and support is outstanding. Morley is another outstanding company. Digitech and DOD used to be quite good for repair and support, but they are now part of Harman International, and that knocks them down to about a three-star rating. Boss is part of the Roland family – see above discussion on Roland. A Behringer pedal is a bargain compared to the others, but consider it a throw-away if it should fail after warranty.

I hope this has shed a little light on some “behind-the-scenes” information on service that a lot of musicians might not know – until it’s too late. Until next time, keep on playin’. I’m Frank the Tech Guy.

Today, let’s talk about service issues on various musical products, and why it’s a good idea to think about these things before you buy a particular brand, or from a particular retailer.

You know, when you buy a car the thought of service most likely enters your mind. The car salesman probably mentions it, or might even take you on a quick tour of the service department. We all know that cars are going to need service. Not so much when it comes to musical gear. Perhaps it’s because we’d rather not think about problems down the road. The salesman might mention the warranty, but they might not tell you exactly how the warranty terms are fulfilled (more on that later). And what about service after the warranty? Let me tell you my perspective on these issues, and hopefully it will make you a bit wiser when it comes time for your next purchase.

First, the brand. Different manufacturers are all over the map when it comes to how well they support their products, and in what manner they support them. I won’t be as organized or detailed as Consumer Reports, but I’ll run through the brands that come to mind, and tell you how well they stack up.

We’ll start with guitar amps. Line 6 pops into my mind, because they are one of the better companies when it comes to support. They have field service centers all over the country, they honor the warranties, they are good at supplying parts to the service centers, so if you decide on a Line 6 product, you’ll be in good hands. Now, they do stop supporting products after a few years … for example, if you own an AxSys from the late 90’s or one of the original Flextones, some parts are no longer available. That’s understandable, because Line 6 products are very similar to computers (actually, they ARE computers in many ways). If you own a 1997 computer today, it’s obsolete and generally not repairable. Same goes for a 1997 Line 6 amp. Digital technology marches on.

What about the traditional companies like Fender and Marshall? In both cases, support is good. Lots of support, good parts availability, product documentation is strong for their flagship products. Consequently, a service guy like me can fix pretty much any problem that might occur in a Fender or Marshall amp, regardless if it is a vintage model from decades ago, or a new issue. One note about both Fender and Marshall … their lower end products (practice amps and smaller wattage units) are not field repairable under warranty – they have to go back to the manufacturer and are replaced with another unit. Turnaround from the time you take your broken amp to a dealer or service center until the time you receive your replacement can be 3-4 weeks. In addition, the manufacturers make no commitment to stock parts for these lower-end products for after warranty service. So, your little Fender or Marshall practice amp may wind up being disposable should it break after the warranty has expired. This is not unique to these companies – most smaller amps from most manufacturers today are similarly throw-aways.

Peavey? Again, good support. In fact, Peavey has one of the best parts departments around today, and they stock many parts for their products from as far back as the 70’s and 80’s. Lots of service centers, lots of documentation – good product choice if you are concerned about repairs.

So far, so good, right? Well, I can’t go any further without talking about the other end of the spectrum. First, I’d like to talk about Crate and Ampeg. About five years ago, if you had asked me to pick some brands that had really good support from the manufacturer, Crate and Ampeg would have been at the top of the list. Part of the St. Louis Music family of brands (SLM Electronics), there wasn’t a better tech support and parts department around. But SLM was purchased by Loud Technologies in 2004, and it has been nothing but pure hell since then. And it’s getting worse. Loud Technologies is a consortium of investors who decided to make money by buying up musical instrument manufacturers and outsourcing all manufacturing. So, they bought Mackie Products first, and closed the factory in Woodinville, WA and moved production to China. Next, as I mentioned, they bought SLM and closed down all Crate and Ampeg manufacturing plants in Arkansas and moved the headquarters operation from St. Louis. More recently, they have purchased Martin Audio. Their technical support is non-existent, their parts department is a total shambles, their warranty support is horrible, their Chinese manufacturing subcontractor has stopped making new products due to lack of payment from Loud, their stock has been removed from NASDAQ due to their failure to file reports with the stock exchange for the past two years, and I expect them to announce bankruptcy any day now. It’s really sad that they could take some brand name products and trash them as completely has they have. Bottom line – be very, very cautious about buying Crate or Ampeg. You won’t find too many stores carrying a selection of these brands right now, since Loud is having serious manufacturing issues. But keep this in mind when buying used products from a store, individual or from eBay. It might be difficult for me to fix it if a need a specific part and Loud Technologies has gone belly-up.

Okay, Frank, what about some high-end tube amps, such as Bogner, Engl, Mesa Boogie?. I can’t say enough good things about Bogner and Engl – they take care of their customers. First, they build very good products, and they stand behind them. ‘Nuff said. Mesa Boogie builds a good product (lots of players love their Dual Rec or Triple Rec). However, some issues come to mind that cloud the Mesa Boogie picture. First, their design on many of their amps is suspect – they use a ton of photocell switching, and the photocell elements that they employ are not without problems. Next, their boards are hand-wired down to the chassis, making component replacement (such as one of the afore-mentioned photocells) very time-consuming and therefore more costly. Finally, they are not dealer or service-center friendly. Let’s just say that they appear to have the “big head”. They never answer their phone – you have to leave a message, and more often than not they don’t return calls. They do have parts support, but it’s hard to order parts when you have trouble reaching them. They are very, very s-l-o-o-o-w-w in paying warranty claims, and so hardly anyone wants to be a Mesa Boogie service center (there is only one authorized service center in Kentucky, in Richmond). Now, I work on a lot of Mesa Boogie amplifiers out of warranty, and generally don’t have problems getting parts because many of the parts are commercially available. But there are a few parts which are custom Mesa Boogie items, and those make it more difficult to service the unit. Just keep in mind when purchasing a ‘Boogie that service is not as smooth as it is with a Marshall, Engl, or Bogner.

Here are some of my ratings on some other major guitar and bass amp manufacturers. My five-star list for service support would include Ashdown, Gallien-Krueger, Genz Benz, Hughes and Kettner, Polytone, Tech 21, Vox, and Yamaha. My four-star candidates are David Eden, Hi-Watt, Lee Jackson, and Randall. The three-star list includes Epiphone, Gibson, Hartke, Laney, Rivera, Soldano, and Trace-Elliott. Remember, these are my rankings based on my experiences and opinions. Your experience may differ.

Can’t end without talking about Behringer. What Wal-Mart is to shopping in your community, Behringer is to the music industry. With Behringer products, all warranty service is in the form of exchange. You take your broken Behringer amp back to the dealer, and they arrange for a replacement unit. On occasion, they may be able to give you a replacement on the spot, if they have sufficient quantity in stock. But that is the exception rather than the rule, and in most cases you’re going to have to wait until they get a replacement from the factory. Most of the time, that’s about 1-2 weeks. Sometimes, however, it can be several weeks, if the warehouse doesn’t have it available. After warranty, service is in the hands of non-warranty service centers, and all of those are stand-alone electronics shops. Behringer has a weird rule about not allowing dealers who sell their products to be a service center for them. So, you may have bought your Behringer from Bill’s Local Music Store, but you’re might to have to take it to Joe’s Electronics for service, even though Bill’s Music has a service center on premise. In Kentucky, there is only one Behringer service center, in Elizabethtown. There are none in Indiana. Servicing Behringer products can be a challenge for non-authorized service centers, due to lack of parts and documentation. Even for the authorized service centers, parts supply can be slow and unpredictable. So, even though Behringer products are actually good buys for the money (some of their products are actually exceptionally good), the adage that “you get what you pay for” still holds true. Service availability may be a bit below your expectations.

Finally, a word about buying online from companies like Musician’s Friend, Sweetwater, American Music Supply, etc. Your problems with a broken unit are generally more complicated and frustrating when dealing with one of these companies than if you bought the same amp from a local brick and mortar dealer. Those of you who have experienced warranty issues with a product from an online retailer know that this is true, and have learned that buying local gives you a true friend in the music business. Today, you’ll get pretty much the same price no matter if you buy it online or buy from a local dealer. So why not support your local dealer and buy here in town? Trust me, you’ll appreciate the extra mile they’ll go for you when the time for service comes.

Next time, we’ll continue this discussion by talking about manufacturer support for PA gear, keyboards, and a little bit about effects units. Until then, keep on playin’. I’m Frank the Tech Guy.

Happy New Year
It’s the beginning of 2009, and best wishes for the New Year! A good new year’s resolution for musicians would be to become more technically knowledgeable in the upcoming year. I’m here to help with that goal, so let’s get started. Today we’re going to discuss cables and connectors used in electronic music and in pro audio.

A good place to start is the type of cable used in various applications. There are three major categories of cables used in the music business: balanced microphone cables, unbalanced shielded instrument cables, and speaker cables. One of the biggest problem areas I see in my work is when the wrong cable is used for an application. Now, this usually isn’t a problem with microphone cables, since their XLR connectors are a dead giveaway as to their purpose, and because the only products which utilize those connectors are microphones, direct boxes, mixers, etc. If the plug fits, you’re in business. It’s hard to make a mistake with microphone cables.

On the other hand, it can be very easy to make a mistake and confuse unbalanced shielded instrument cables with certain types of speaker cables. If you utilize the wrong cable for an application in this area, the quality of your audio will suffer and it may even cost you money for the repair of damaged equipment. So, here’s a quick tutorial on the finer points of speaker cables and instrument cables.

1/4 inch plug
First, let’s talk about unbalanced shielded instrument cables. These are commonly referred to as “guitar cords”, because that is certainly one of their primary applications. In addition to connecting guitars to amps, they are also used to connect keyboards, synthesizers, electronic percussion, etc to their respective amplifiers. Shorter lengths are used to interconnect floor effects units (“stomp boxes”) and rack-mounted audio effects processors. They are characterized by their ¼” phone plugs on each end, and shielded cable is used as the audio highway. Shielded cable means that one conductor is concentric, or wrapped, around the other conductor. The problem is that many speaker cables also utilize 1/4” phone plugs on each end – the difference is that speaker cables use unshielded cable. Unfortunately, it may be hard to distinguish between the two, and therefore easy to use the incorrect cable for an application.

What happens if you should use a speaker cable to connect an instrument to an amplifier? In a word – hum, and lots of it. Cables which connect to the inputs of amplifiers (or interconnect devices which then in turn connect to the inputs of amplifiers, such as effects units) need to be shielded cables. Generally, no damage occurs should you inadvertently use a speaker cable in place of an instrument cable (unless you have the volume on the amp set so high that the hum is overpowering and damages your speakers before you can power down the system).

But what happens if you use a shielded instrument cable to connect a speaker to a power amplifier or powered mixer? This is especially bad, because there are no immediate telltale clues that you’ve done anything wrong. The speakers will work – but, unknown to you, there will be considerable signal loss in that instrument cable. Instrument cables use conductors that are quite thin, because they are designed to carry only a very small signal, and don’t really need to be very large. When used as speaker cables, you could easily be losing 10% to 30% of the output power of the amplifier in that instrument cable. Where does the power go? It is dissipated in the form of heat within the cable itself. Heating the cable actually increases the resistance of the cable, which in turn increases the signal loss – a vicious cycle. You will be setting your mixer and amplifier volume “by ear” to get the right sound level in the room, and so you will be turning up the level even louder, forcing more power through the cable. Now you have another vicious cycle on your hands. You may not even realize that you are running your equipment nearly wide open to achieve a decent volume in the room. Your PA system itself is running very warm, cranking out the watts that you are demanding that it deliver. Sooner or later, something has to give. The cable may melt down internally, causing a short circuit on the output of the amplifier. Or, the power amp or powered mixer itself may fail from its own overheating. Either way, your gig may be suddenly interrupted by the loss of audio, and you’re going to be out some big bucks for the repair.

If your PA system uses 1/4” – 1/4″ speaker cables, be absolutely certain that the cables you have for that application are indeed speaker cables, and make sure you do not intermingle them with instrument cables. I need to clarify one point on this issue. If you have powered speakers (speaker cabinets with a built-in power amplifier, meaning that the speaker cabinet must be connected to 120V AC in order to operate), then you should use instrument cables to run the output of your mixer to the powered speaker. This is a low-level signal, and the powered speaker requires shielded cable to its input. A better choice is an XLR-XLR microphone cable, if the powered speaker features an XLR input, and if your mixing board has a balanced XLR main output.

Today, many newer systems have eliminated the use of 1/4″ – 1/4″ speaker cables in favor of other types of connections. This is a definite improvement, as it eliminates the possibility of error in grabbing the wrong cable. Plus, 1/4” connectors were never designed for the amount of current needed by today’s high wattage systems. Here are some other types of connectors found on speaker cables today:

Speakon connector
Speakon is a type (and brand) of multi-pin connector developed by Neutrik which is commonly found on speakers and amplifiers with high wattage ratings. Speakon connectors offer a very reliable connection, can handle extremely high power, are very durable, and are relatively low cost compared to other connectors.

Dual Banana Plug
A banana plug is an electrical connector designed to join audio wires such as speaker wires to the binding posts on the back of many power amplifiers or to special jacks called, of course, banana jacks. A common configuration of banana plugs is to have two of them molded together and spaced 3/4″ apart, which is also the spacing of the binding post receptacles on the back of power amps. Technically this assembly is referred to as a “double-banana” plug. An advantage of banana plugs is the relatively large metal surface area used for the connection, which virtually eliminates signal loss at the connection point. Disadvantages include the ease in which the plug can accidentally be reversed (turned over), causing speakers to be out-of-phase with each other. Also, the banana plug can be easily pulled out of the banana jack should you accidentally yank or trip on the cable on stage.

Bare Wire
Bare wire is the most basic (and least recommended) way to connect audio. It consists of dual-conductor cable, stripped of insulation at the ends to expose the individual conductors. These can be inserted into binding posts or hooked around screw terminals that are then tightened down. Besides the general “messiness” of bare wire, you must always make sure to match the “hot” and “ground” conductors of the cable on the outputs of the amp and the inputs of the speaker to prevent phasing problems. We don’t recommend this type of connection other than in an emergency.

Some systems require a combination of these connectors, so a hybrid cable is needed. For example, your power amp may have banana jacks only, and your speakers have Speakon connectors – in this case, you’ll need speaker cables with banana plugs at one end and Speakon connectors on the other end. The good news is that with these type of cables, you’ll never inadvertently connect an instrument cable in place of a speaker cable – the connectors won’t fit.

Finally, what is the best type connector for speaker cables? I would enthusiastically recommend Speakon connectors at both ends, if compatible with your equipment. Speakon connectors have good contact area for minimal loss, are twist-lock by design so they can’t be accidentally disconnected, and are durable. Definitely a good choice for the new year!

Frank the Tech Guy

Header

It’s my guess that there are few musicians who haven’t been faced from time to time with the unfortunate reality of a speaker that cries for attention. Perhaps it’s a blown speaker that succumbed to too much power, which means it is now totally silent due to an open voice coil, or it may be badly distorted due to a burnt coil that is rubbing the magnet or perhaps locked in place. Or, it could be a speaker damaged by accident – dropped, torn, rain-damaged or punched through. Or, there is that vintage Jensen in your prized blackface Fender Deluxe whose age has caught up with it, and the paper cone is slowly turning to dust. Whatever the situation, the speaker is in serious need of attention, and your attention is drawn to the choice you need to make: Recone or replace?

Speaker reconing is a repair technique which was popular back in the 60’s and 70’s, but then seemed to decline for a period of time. More recently, however, it is again a viable option and in many cases is worth your consideration.

First, let’s talk about the reconing process and what it involves. In a nutshell, speaker reconing involves replacing all of the moving parts of a loudspeaker – these are the parts that typically fail over time with use (or in some cases, abuse). In the diagram below, the cone, surround, dust cap, spider and voice coil are replaced in a speaker reconing project. The speaker basket, pole piece, top plate and the magnet are normally not damaged and therefore are not replaced.

Speaker Assembly

In most cases it is best to consider reconing your old speakers. They are the speakers that the cabinets were designed for. Someone spent a great deal of time and money designing the cabinets. A great deal of math was involved in building the cabinets with a certain amount of air space. The manufacture “tuned” the cabinets by building the cabinets specifically for the old speakers. If you grab other speakers and throw them in the cabinets, they will not sound the same as your old speakers. Reconing is the best method to reclaim the sound of your original speakers when they were new.

What about the cost? For most name-brand speakers used in good quality musical instrument or pro audio cabinets, the cost of reconing is anywhere from 30% to 50% less than the cost of replacing the speakers with new speakers of exact or similar specifications. Now, there are exceptions to this, and cases where reconing could cost about the same as replacement – those situations are with lower wattage speakers, small voice coils and small magnet speakers. In such situations, replacing the speaker would be the cost-effective solution. However … if we are talking about a vintage amplifier with a low wattage speaker (think 1960’s Fender Princeton or Champ), it would be economically wise to recone the speaker rather than replace it. The incentive here is to maintain the vintage value of the amplifier. Replacing the original Fender-branded Jensen or Oxford speaker in a Fender amp with a current-day Eminence replacement could drop the resale value of the amplifier by $150-$200. Having the original speaker professionally reconed maintains the value of the amp.

There are professional speaker technicians across the country who will take the time and care to recone your speaker and restore the original sound. I personally have reconed a lot of speakers over the years and take personal satisfaction in listening to the sound quality of the speaker when audio is first applied after the reconing process is complete. Reconing is truly an art, and the reconing artists take pride in our work.

If replacement of the speaker is the chosen option, try to get the original speaker if still available. Many OEM speakers of more recent vintage were made by Eminence, and the Eminence factory offers a service to their dealers in which they will make a recommendation as to the closest Eminence replacement speaker based on the make and model of your unit. If your old speaker is Celestion, many of their vintage speakers are still being made (such as the classic G12M “greenbacks”). Jensen is back as a brand name, and they are making many speakers which emulate their original vintage lines. (It may be worth noting that this is not the same as the original Jensen company – the new Jensen manufacturing facility is in Italy). Another good guitar amp speaker company with Kentucky roots is Warehouse Speakers, located in Paducah. Warehouse specializes in making “British” type speakers which emulate the Celestion sound – at very reasonable prices.

Welcome, all! This new blog is designed to address some of the many questions I receive regularly from local musicians about technical issues. We’ll cover a variety of topics, and I welcome comments and questions.

First, a quick introduction. I’m Frank Fendley, and I’ve been repairing electronic musical gear in the Louisville area since the 1970’s. I’ve worked directly for four different music stores during that time, and have done contract work behind the scenes for several other local stores as well. So, if you’re a Louisville musician, there’s a good chance I’ve worked on some of your equipment in the past.

Today I’d like to talk about tubes. Of all the questions I receive, issues about tubes and tube amps ranks right near the top of the list. You know, guitar players of today and perhaps fifty years ago are linked by some common threads … certainly the classic Gibson Les Paul, the vintage Fender Stratocaster, and of course – tube guitar amps. So, let’s talk about the heart of the tube amp – those little “fire bottles” we call tubes, and the British call “valves”. We’ll format this article along the lines of “Frequently Asked Questions”.

Why do guitar players prefer tube amps over solid state (transistorized) amps?
One word – tone. Tube amps work differently than transistor amps. When tubes “break up”, or begin to go into distortion, the clipping is compressed, gradual, rounded, warm and soft. In technical terms, it is rich in both even and odd harmonics. Transistor amps are clean and distortion-free until they reach the limit of their design. At that point, they clip the tops and bottoms of the signal sharply, symmetrically, and harshly. The resultant signal contains mostly odd harmonics, and generally sounds hollow, cold and fuzzy. Now, for about the past fifteen years, you can purchase digital modeling amplifiers introduced by Line 6 and copied by many others. These amps are solid state, and yet emulate very accurately the tonal quality of many vintage tube amps. Do these modeling amps blow apart the theory that solid state amps can’t sound as good as tube amps? Well, yes and no. These amps derive their sound from digital technology and sampling of the actual sounds produced by the tube amps they model. It’s kind of like “capturing” or “recording” that sweet sound of a Fender Deluxe or a Marshall JTM45, and being able to play back that captured sound, but with you at the controls (that is, your guitar strings). So, yes, they sound as good as the tube amps, but digital wizardry is their secret – not a new type of transistor circuit that behaves exactly like a tube amp. That circuit design still eludes engineers, in most guitarists’ opinions.

How does a tube work?
A tube is an electronic device that has at least four active elements: cathode, heater, grid and plate. These four elements are sealed in a glass enclosure with the air removed. A low voltage is applied to the terminals of the filament, producing a dim orange glow and moderate heat. Once the cathode reaches a minimum temperature, it begins to emit electrons which flow toward the positively charged plate. The grid is physically between the cathode and the plate, and the application of voltage to the grid (either bias voltage or signal voltage) controls the flow of electrons from cathode to plate. If the grid were not present, the flow of electrons would be uncontrolled, much like water running from a faucet opened all the way.

So, the grid acts as a valve to control the electron flow, which explains the origin of the British term “valve”. A small voltage signal applied to the grid produces a nearly identical large current change in the electron flow from cathode to plate. In this manner, the tube amplifies the input signal, transforming a tiny signal originating in your guitar pickup to a larger signal appearing on the plate of the tube. Cascading several stages of tube amplification builds up the signal to a level strong enough to drive a speaker and fill a room.

Why are output tubes sold in matched sets, and is it important to use matched sets of tubes?
Tubes are still primarily made by hand today, and there are naturally slight variations which occur between each tube that is produced. These variations are primarily minute differences in the spacing between the elements inside the tube, and in how perfect a vacuum is achieved inside the glass. (A perfect vacuum – no air molecules whatsoever – is not realistically obtainable, but the ideal tube is as void of oxygen and nitrogen as possible).

These variations cause tubes to behave somewhat differently. Since it is not economically practical to tighten quality control in manufacturing to the point where nearly all tubes would be essentially identical in behavior, the next best thing is to test and measure tubes after they are built, and group them according to their specific test results. Most amplifiers’ outputs are designed as what is known as Class AB; that is, an even number of output tubes are used, and the tubes each contribute as a team to producing the final output signal to the speaker via the output transformer. If you put tires on your car, you want them to be all the same type and size to provide the best ride. One tire larger than the others would produce a poor ride and eventually damage your suspension. Likewise, mismatched tubes produce a poor quality sound, result in shorter tube life, and can damage other components such as the output transformer.

What is bias, and why is it important?
Bias is a fixed control voltage applied to the grid of the output tube to balance the amount of idle current flowing from cathode to plate. Because tubes differ in characteristics (see the discussion above about tube matching), every tube requires just a slightly different bias voltage in order to achieve the optimum idle current flow. This is very much akin to the idle speed setting on your car’s engine. When properly set, you car idles smoothly and performs properly. If the idle speed is too low, your car coughs and gasps at low speeds, and frequently dies at stop lights. If set too high, your engine races, you waste fuel, and you have to apply the brakes harder to keep the car from moving. Likewise, if the bias is set so that too little current flows in the output tubes at idle, the amp sounds cold, brittle, and hollow. Lower volume settings on the amp sound fuzzy and lifeless, and background hum may be noticeable. If the bias allows too much idle current to flow, the amp runs very hot, the tubes’ plates may actually glow red-hot, and the overdriven sound of the amplifier sounds harsh. In addition, the tubes’ life is severely shortened due to the overheating. In an amplifier with adjustable bias, it is very important to have the bias adjusted properly each time you change the output tubes. Proper bias improves the sound of the amplifier and optimizes the life of your output tubes.

What about brands of tubes? I see so many different brands available. And what are NOS tubes?
First, let’s take a look at a little history. Tubes used to be made in many countries around the world. In the late 1970’s, demand for tubes began to shrink as fewer and fewer tube-type televisions and radios were still in operation. By the early1980’s, tube manufacturing in the United States had ceased. The last tube plant in America was only about 100 miles from Louisville on Old Hartford Road in Owensboro, Kentucky – the General Electric tube factory. Tubes being sold today which are NOS (new “old stock”) were made in these now-defunct factories some decades ago. NOS tubes are understandably costly, since they are a shrinking commodity. However, let the buyer beware. Not all NOS tubes are “new” – some (especially preamp tubes like 12AX7’s) could be actually used tubes which have been cleaned up and put back in their original boxes. And, there are actually counterfeit NOS tubes out there – new Russian or Chinese tubes which have been rebranded and placed in old boxes or even counterfeit boxes. So, if you are purist and want new vintage tubes and are willing to pay the price, choose carefully the seller from whom you buy.

Guitar amp tubes manufactured today come primarily from Russia, China, the Slovak Republic, and Serbia. In Russia, the Reflector Xpo-Pul factory in Saratov is owned by Mike Mathews of Electro-Harmonix fame, and produces Sovtek, Electro-Harmonix and the “new” Svetlana brand tubes. The original Svetlana factory in St. Petersburg produces the new SED Winged-C tubes. In my opinion, all of these tubes are of good quality and quite reliable. A special nod for exceptional tone quality goes to the SED Winged-C brand, but take note that Winged-C tubes cost about twice as much as Sovtek, Svetlana and Electro-Harmonix.

Audio tubes in China come from the Shuguang factory, and are marketed under the Shuguang name, as well as the Ruby name. Chinese tubes are generally less expensive than Russian tubes, and their preamp tubes are especially warm sounding. However, quality control can be a problem, although it is improving. You may find that some of their preamp tubes are a bit microphonic, or their output tubes tend to flame out early. If you have a desire to try Chinese tubes, I would stick with the 12AX7 preamp tubes, and buy your output tubes and rectifiers from another country.

Years ago, Tesla had several factories in Czechoslovakia. An individual named Jan Jurco bought the Telsa factory equipment at a liquidation sale a few years ago, and opened a new factory in the Slovak Republic. The new tubes carry his initials followed by the name from which the new factory claims its heritage: JJ Tesla. JJ Tesla tubes tend to have high gain and high output, making them interesting choices when trying to “soup up” an old amp. However, this high gain also makes them candidates for hum, noise and microphonics in some amp designs. My experience with JJ tubes has not been all that good – I’ve seen a higher-than-expected failure rate in preamp tubes. At this point, JJ Tesla is not high on my list. I recognize that many players love their JJ’s, and that’s fine – if they’ve had good success, they are certainly entitled to their opinion.

Tubes branded “EI” were made by Electronska Industries in Serbia. The company is currently undergoing restructuring by the Serbian government, and apparently is not currently producing tubes. If you see EI tubes on the market, they were made before 2006.

There are many “private” brands of tubes made for manufacturers. Many amp manufacturers have their own line of tubes with their brand name – commonly found are Marshall, Mesa Boogie, Peavey, and Fender. All of these tubes are made by one of the above factories. Some of the tubes are custom-made by these factories to the amplifier manufacturers’ specifications, such as the Mesa Boogie STR series. Others are just standard off-the-shelf tubes which are rebranded (most Fender tubes are standard Sovteks).

Other brands such as Mullard, Ruby, Tungsol, Genalex, etc, are made by one or more of the above factories. Some of these are made to different specifications than the other brands produced by the same factory.

Finally, there are the boutique tube marketers: Groove Tubes and ARS Tubes. These companies have tubes made for them by the Russian, Chinese, or Slovak factories with their brands, and then they retest the tubes and provide extensive matching and classification information on each package. A lot of Groove Tubes are Sovtek made, and a lot of ARS tubes are JJ Tesla. In theory, you are getting the higher level of quality control which may be missing at the factory, and Groove Tubes or ARS tubes should be of the highest quality, premium matched, and most reliable. For that, you are paying about twice the price of the original tube before they tested and categorized it. However, my experience over the years has not been impressive with Groove Tubes – rather than seeing a higher degree of reliability, I’ve seen a higher rate of failure, which I can’t explain. ARS tubes seem to be better than Groove Tubes in terms of reliability, but many ARS tubes are JJ Tesla, and as mentioned earlier, I’m not a big fan of JJ’s.

How often should I change tubes?
Preamp tubes last a long time, and generally they don’t need to be changed frequently unless you have a failure. Rectifier tubes in amps which use them (such as the Mesa Boogie Dual and Triple Rectifier and the vintage Fender amps) also tend to last a long time. Output tubes are a different story. You probably need new output tubes (and the all-important bias adjustment) when your amp starts sounding weak, makes funny noises, lacks punch, or loses high or lows. In any of these cases, though, the tubes may not be the culprit. A professional can diagnose the problem and make the proper repair.

From a preventative maintenance perspective, you should change your output tubes before they create the problems mentioned above, just as you should change tires on your car before they are bald. For an average player, that translates to about once per year. If you are a heavy player (several nights a week), six months would be the recommended interval.

I hope this has shed some light on the mystery of tubes and tube amps. Until next time, remember that no trees were destroyed in the creation of this document. However, some electronics may have been inconvenienced!

Frank the Tech Guy

© 2012 Frank the Tech Guy Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha